The Beiruter

Why Hezbollah opposes the Lebanon-Israel agreement, examining whether its position is driven by the deal's substance or by who negotiated it.

As Tehran and Washington test a fragile diplomatic opening, the greatest obstacle to a lasting agreement may come from divisions within Iran’s own power structure.

A shifting balance of power in Lebanon is redefining the country's role in negotiations with Israel while raising questions about the future of Iranian and Hezbollah influence.

Nabih Berri’s rejection of the latest Lebanon-Israel joint statement raises renewed questions about his role in relation to Hezbollah and Iran.

Lebanon’s push for political progress with Israel increasingly hinges on whether the long-standing dispute over Hezbollah’s weapons can be resolved. 

New U.S. sanctions signal a major shift in Washington’s strategy toward Hezbollah’s influence inside Lebanese state institutions.

Lebanon’s direct negotiations with Israel are emerging as a pivotal test of state sovereignty, diplomacy, and the country’s ability to escape another cycle of war and collapse.

How the legacy of February 6, 1984 continues to shape Lebanon’s political system, deep state structures, and relationship with Hezbollah and Israel.

President Joseph Aoun’s push for direct talks with Israel, examining whether negotiations alone can secure peace without resolving internal sovereignty challenges.

Iran’s declining regional influence is opening a new Middle East power vacuum shaped by Israel, Arab states, Turkey, and Lebanon.

A fragile ten-day truce exposes the widening gap between Hezbollah’s claims of victory and the mounting human, territorial, and political costs, as President Aoun asserts a decisive shift toward state sovereignty and peace.

Lebanon stands at a critical crossroads where state inaction, Hezbollah’s arms, and Israel’s containment strategy converge, opening a fragile but historic window for peace.

A widening U.S.–Israeli war with Iran could redefine regional power dynamics, with Hezbollah’s future hinging on whether Tehran’s post-war regime severs its ties to Lebanon.

A closer look at Nabih Berri’s role as Lebanon navigates rising Iranian influence and internal political contradictions.

Growing anger within Hezbollah’s Shiite support base is exposing contradictions in the party’s narrative as the consequences of opening a front in support of Iran are felt immediately across southern Lebanon and Beirut’s southern suburbs.

How Hezbollah’s decision to reopen the southern front has reignited war in Lebanon, deepening the human, economic, and political costs for Lebanese society.

US President Donald Trump authorized Operation Epic Fury, a joint US-Israel military strike on Iran, killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and targeting nuclear, missile, and military sites.

Hezbollah shifts the costs of war onto the Lebanese state while retaining control over conflict decisions, exposing a deeper crisis of sovereignty and accountability in Lebanon.

As momentum builds to hold Lebanon’s parliamentary elections on time, disputes over expatriate voting, shifting political calculations, and regional tensions threaten to reshape the electoral path.

Donald Trump is redefining global politics by abandoning fixed alliances and “land for peace,” favoring a transactional approach that trades economic opportunity and living standards for security and stability.

After intensifying protests and harsh repression in Iran, U.S. President Donald Trump halted plans for a direct military strike, opting instead to press diplomatic and economic pressure while keeping force “on the table.”

Iran’s latest protests unfold amid shifting regional dynamics, renewed international pressure, and unprecedented participation from key pillars of society, signaling a potential historic turning point.

An overview of how a long-standing political formula continues to circulate in Lebanon’s public and political discourse.

Promises of reform and state authority in 2025 have faded amid hesitation, stalled change, and security compromises.

October 7 marked a strategic rupture that weakened both Sunni and Shiite Political Islam across the region.

The collapse of Arab Nationalism after 1967 created a political vacuum later filled by Political Islam.

From revolutionary origins to corrupt elite class, Hezbollah’s transformation exposed vulnerabilities exploited during recent conflict.

A deep look at how Iran filled the void left by Imam Musa Al-Sadr to reshape Lebanon’s Shiite community and extend its influence across the country’s political landscape.

Lebanon faces rising global warnings as political paralysis and Hezbollah’s weapons drive it toward escalating danger.

The 2026 elections are framed as Lebanon’s last chance to break the grip of the ruling system and restore state authority through massive expatriate participation.

Hezbollah’s open letter publicly challenges Berri, revealing a rift within the Shiite political alliance.

Lebanon risks deeper instability as state inaction empowers an armed group vulnerable to both state authority and internal Shiite divisions.

Lebanon faces a constitutional dispute over limiting expatriate voting, seen as a move to protect entrenched political powers from diaspora influence.

A look at the absence of Shiite opposition in Lebanon amid Hezbollah’s continued dominance and the state’s failure to restore authority.

From the spectacle at Raouché Rock to the daily paralysis of institutions, Hezbollah's arms undermine sovereignty, weaken the army and security forces, and threaten the country’s stability.

In the wake of the recent war, Lebanon’s Shiite community is turning away from confrontation and demanding stability, but Hezbollah’s grip through arms, services, and political monopoly still blocks meaningful change.